{"id":292,"date":"2022-11-15T04:28:21","date_gmt":"2022-11-15T04:28:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/?p=292"},"modified":"2022-11-15T04:28:21","modified_gmt":"2022-11-15T04:28:21","slug":"tension-in-teaching","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/2022\/11\/15\/tension-in-teaching\/","title":{"rendered":"Tension in teaching"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The following quote is by Matt Emerton (in a <a href=\"https:\/\/mathoverflow.net\/questions\/12009\/is-there-a-slick-proof-of-the-classification-of-finitely-generated-abelian-group#comment19026_12014\">comment on MathOverflow<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nI think there is a genuine tension between proofs that a professional will like (where professional here may mean <I> professional algebraist<\/I>!) and ones that are elementary. For professionals, reductions and devissages are easy, natural, and we don&#8217;t even think of them as real landmarks in the proof; they are just serve as passages between the key points and ideas. But in writing things out, they can take a lot of words, and seem (as you wrote) mysterious and difficult. I don&#8217;t know the best way to deal with this tension.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Interestingly, Matt posted it as part of a discussion about exactly what I wanted to talk about in this post, the teaching of the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups, or more generally, of finitely generated modules over a PID. <\/p>\n<p>My personal connection is that I taught this as part of our third-year algebra course this year at the University of Melbourne, and am slated to do so again next year. I think that I did not do a particularly good job of teaching it in 2022, primarily because I got distracted by the reductions and devissages and tried to proceed along those lines as much as possible, when what I have learned is more appropriate for one of these courses is the more prosaic approach involving matrix manipulations. It is with the matrix manipulations (directly proving Smith Normal Form) that I plan to teach this part of the course in 2023 (and beyond, if necessary).<\/p>\n<p>For completeness, allow me to state the professionals&#8217; proof: Split off the quotient by the torsion subgroup to reduce to the torsion case. Then canonically decompose the module into a direct sum of its p-primary components. Then use the fact that <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-content\/ql-cache\/quicklatex.com-3bc7ac95a2c64045c7ab939baf22ed85_l3.png\" class=\"ql-img-inline-formula quicklatex-auto-format\" alt=\"&#82;&#47;&#40;&#112;&#94;&#101;&#41;\" title=\"Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com\" height=\"19\" width=\"51\" style=\"vertical-align: -5px;\"\/> is injective over itself to manually split the remaining short exact sequences needed to complete the classification.<\/p>\n<p>While it may not be reasonable to expect a third-year student to follow this proof, I think it is fair to expect any PhD student of mine to be able to understand and execute this proof.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following quote is by Matt Emerton (in a comment on MathOverflow) I think there is a genuine tension between proofs that a professional will like (where professional here may mean professional algebraist!) and ones that are elementary. For professionals, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/2022\/11\/15\/tension-in-teaching\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maths"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7V6a7-4I","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":297,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions\/297"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petermc.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}